TEXAS REDISTRICTING & ELECTION LAW

Updates about ongoing redistricting litigation in the Lone Star State and coverage of election law more generally. This website's goal is to try to make sure the redistricting process and litigation over voting law is as transparent and accessible as possible to the public. Hopefully, it will be of some use to a broad range of interested parties, both lawyers and non-lawyers. Have questions, comments, suggestions, additional content, or a redistricting joke (or two)? Feel free to contact me: Michael Li, michael@beonetexas.com, 214.675.6879. You also can follow me on Twitter: @mcpli

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge brought by Shelby County, Alabama to the continued constitutionality of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

In its order taking the case, the high court limited the issues before the court to the question of “[w]hether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula … exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.”

Shelby County and other challengers have argued continuing to use a standard that looks at behavior 40 years ago to determine if a state or jurisdiction is subject to having voting related changes precleared by the Justice Department or a panel of federal judges places excessive burdens on jurisdictions that once were - but no longer are - problem jurisdictions.

In 2009, Justices considered the same issue but avoided deciding the question by resolving the case on non-constitutional grounds.

More from Rick Hasen of Election Law Blog here and from SCOTUSblog here.

  1. texasredistricting posted this