Updates about ongoing redistricting litigation in the Lone Star State and coverage of election law more generally. This website's goal is to try to make sure the redistricting process and litigation over voting law is as transparent and accessible as possible to the public. Hopefully, it will be of some use to a broad range of interested parties, both lawyers and non-lawyers. Have questions, comments, suggestions, additional content, or a redistricting joke (or two)? Feel free to contact me: Michael Li, michael.li@mlilaw.com, 202.681.0641.
Posts I Like

The Texas redistricting appeal wasn’t on the list of cases reviewed by the Justices at their screening conference today.

With the passage of time - and the case not even being listed for review - the calendar now makes it highly unlikely that the court could take up the case even if it later decides to grant full review.  The four cases which the court did grant today are expected to be argued in April at the court’s last scheduled oral arguments.  So taking the Texas case and hearing it this year would require an unusual special setting - and there has been no indication that the court sees that kind of urgency in the case.

Instead, many observers have speculated that the high court has deferred deciding what to do with the Texas case until it decides in Shelby Co. v. Holder whether section 5 of the Voting Rights Act remains constitutional.

Of course, it is possible that the court later could summarily affirm the opinion below or dismiss the appeal as requested by the Justice Department and redistricting litigants (which would not require argument), but it looks increasingly likely that any action on the Texas redistricting appeal could be an issue for the 2013-14 term and not this one.

If so, the question then becomes whether the San Antonio panel takes any action to begin drawing remedial maps as well as address other legal challenges - or whether the San Antonio panel also decides to wait for Shelby Co.  To date, the court has not taken any action since receiving scheduling proposals from the parties in early December. 

While waiting arguably makes sense, the challenge could become having to quickly draw remedial maps if section 5 is upheld - since a decision in the Shelby Co. case very likely might not come until late June.  Any changes to the maps would require redrawing precinct lines and a number of other technical steps, and the countdown to the filing date for the Texas primary starts in September.

While early dates could be tweaked, the court will have to balance not taking unnecessary steps against the possibility that the Texas primary election schedule could be messed up again.

  1. texasredistricting posted this